Focus On Consulting

by Christopher Juillet

Home / Archives / Back Issues 1994 /

Proposed Legislation Will Set Aside Supreme Court Decision on In-home Office Deductions

More than a year has passed since the Supreme Court reaffirmed the IRS' interpretation of rules curtailing deductions of in-home office expenses for independent consultants and contractors. Since that time, thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands, of self-employed professionals have been adversely affected by this ruling.

Soliman vs. IRS

To recap, the Supreme Court, in January 1993, overturned a Tax Court decision allowing an in-home office deduction for Dr. Nader Soliman, a self-employed anesthesiologist.

While Dr. Soliman spent 10 to 15 hours of administrative time each week in his in-home office, the high court determined that he was not allowed a deduction for that office space, since he did not perform his principal work, that of anesthetizing patients prior to surgery, in his office and that therefore, it was not his "principal place of business."

The ruling reaffirms the Internal Revenue Service's interpretation of the current home office deduction rules:

Proposed Legislative Fix

In June of 1993, Senator Conrad Burns (R-Montana) proposed legislation (S.1116) that would, if enacted, restore deductions for in-home offices "used regularly and solely for business purposes." The bill sets forth these criteria for determining whether an in-home office is truly one's "principal place of business":

While Senator Burns' bill has merit, two newer companion bills have recently been introduced into the Senate and House of Representatives. Known as the "Home Office Deduction Act of 1994," Senate bill S.1924 (proposed by Senator Orrin Hatch [R-Utah]) and House bill H.R.3407 (proposed by Representative Peter Hoagland [D-Nebraska]) are identical. If enacted, they will amend the IRS code to define an in-home office as the principal place of business if:

"(A) the office is the location where the taxpayer's essential administrative or management activities are conducted on a regular and systematic (and not incidental) basis by the tax-payer, and

"(B) the office is necessary because the taxpayer has no other location for the performance of the administrative or management activities of the business."

The bills also extend the IRS code to include not only storage of inventory but of "inventory and product samples" as part of the test of whether an in-home office is deductible. If enacted, the legislation will apply retroactively, beginning with taxable year 1992.

Next Steps

In order to best represent us, our U.S. senators and representatives need to know our views on pending legislation. For additional information, contact me:

Christopher Juillet, Publisher
Independent Consultant's Briefing
P.O. Box 1725
Ann Arbor, Mich. 48106
Telephone: (313) 449-0310
Fax: (313) 449-0351
CompuServe: 70272,1327

Note: Thanks to Tara Pryde of Senator Conrad Burns' legislative staff for her assistance.

Christopher Juillet is an independently employed technical writer, consultant and publisher of the Independent Consultant's Briefing, a quarterly newsletter for and by independent consultants.

Copyright 1994 by Christopher Juillet. All rights reserved.


© 2002 by STC Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Originally published July/August 1994 in the Boston Broadside